In Mr. Ryder's response
to my request for explicit financial details of PUC intervenor costs, he states
"... My intent was to provide a summary of information that was requested
by a member of the community during a Council Meeting........"
In his January
2014 Council slide Mr. Ryder is selectively providing financial
information when it serves his purpose and in doing so, fails to substantiate a
"claimed 332 hours” of staff time...to which he arbitrarily assigned a
cost of $12,928. Mr. Ryder has a responsibility to substantiate that amount of
money with explicit answers to the questions: WHO, WHAT, WHY, WHEN?
On the other hand when Geraldine Logan,
as an owner of the community, requested financial details on what community
monies were spent on the Center for FY 11, FY 12, and FY 13, Mr. Ryder
categorically refused to provide the information and that refusal was supported
by the Board.
Tell me Mr. Ryder, how
is providing financial information to an owner of the community in your January
2014 Council presentation and on the other hand refusing to provide Center financial
spending information to my wife, not discriminatory when you select for whom you
will provide financial information? And when you select what financial information you choose to provide and at
what level of detail?
Furthermore, Mr. Ryder you have provided
absolutely no substantiation for your claims, which obviously are arbitrary.
Submitted by Robert Logan who is the CEO of a consulting practice since 1993 which provides expertise on improved business, financial and operational performance as well as leadership.
Submitted by Robert Logan who is the CEO of a consulting practice since 1993 which provides expertise on improved business, financial and operational performance as well as leadership.
No comments:
Post a Comment